The Gun Debate seems as easy to solve as to ask the people:
Will you sacrifice your guns? No? Okay. Good enough. Keep it.
The second amendment guarantees you that right, it was good enough for my forefather, and it is good enough for me.
I personally don’t care if you want to keep your gun because you are a hunter, or because you shoot targets, or you have them for home protection. I can understand the argument that we need to be armed to keep our Government honest—I know that history repeats itself and various Governments’ have used the tricks of rounding up all of the weapons from the people, before the armies could march through and slaughter some of them.
Maybe you have a gun for Zombies…okay…I think you watch too much TV if you really believe zombies are coming, but if that is the case—remember to aim for the brain stem.
I grew up in Idaho amongst hunters. By the time I was twelve, I could shoot an army guy off a stump at twenty paces with a .22 pistol. Literally every single adult person that I knew had a gun—shotguns, rifles, pistols. Every single kid that I knew had a bee-bee gun, getting a bee-bee gun is almost a rite of passage, for both boys and girls. Everyone, from my grandpa to my baby sister had access to a firearm, and every one of us knows how to use them.
I have seen my fair share of fancy little single shooters pistols—I once trolled a gun show when I was looking for a boyfriend and I was too young to get into the bar. The things is, these gun owners that I know—some of which might be driving a truck that has been sporting a gun rack since 1975—
We aren’t going to give away all of our guns. Sure, we might sacrifice some of them, but odds are damn good we have one hid somewhere so good that even we couldn’t find it. We have guns that have been passed down from our great grandfathers, and guns that use musket balls and gun powder and ting little six pistols that only shoot one bullet. They are ours, and we aren’t giving them away.
Will you sacrifice your guns? Yes? Okay, Good for you!
I assume that you are sacrificing them because you believe that a world without guns is a safer world. I adore that attitude. I think there should be a world full of people with just that attitude; I applaud you and your willingness to sacrifice for an ideal. History repeats itself—Gandhi did alright for himself with the peaceful resistance.
I recognize that you have an opinion on guns, and your opinion may be that people shouldn’t have guns. I support your right to have that opinion. But history repeats itself, and I think it was Freud that point out you can’t change other people’s behavior, only your own.
Or was that Oprah? Either way—wherever you stand in the gun debate, you have made a decision and it is unlikely that you are going to change the mind of someone who is the opposite camp. Maybe we can call a Truce—the gun owners won’t demand that everyone who doesn’t have a gun go buy one and non-gun owners can stop demanding the gun owners give away their guns.
The only thing the gun debate is good for is a subject to talk about at a social gathering when you can’t think of anything else to talk about: What do you think of the gun ban?” is a great conversation opener and you can ask that question and then sit back and watch the debate.